Critically evaluate how organisation culture and leadership

Critically evaluate how organisation culture and leadership

Assignment Task:Critically evaluate how organisation culture and leadership styles impact creative labour andprecarious work.Student’s essay should discuss the following:– Include discussion on organisation culture such as Brown’s model of culture andsocialisation and how communication takes please within the different culturalcontexts, or Culture model by Roger Harrison.– Consider the organisational structure and the structure of communication inorganisations.– Consider the leadership styles – for example, Blake and Mouton leadership Grid– Consider the workplace dynamics – how employees interact with one another; interand intra-group behaviours; how management treat the employees; the different waysthat management interact with employees; employee’s performance at the workplace.– Include discussion on what constitutes creative labour and precarious workMarking GuideFirst Class (70 and Above): Work of outstanding quality on major objectives of subjectWork is relatively rare and is expected to stand out from the work of other students. Thework directly addresses the question or problems raised; provides a coherent argumentdisplaying an extensive knowledge of relevant information; critically evaluates concepts andtheory; relates theory to practice; reflects the student’s own argument and is not just arepetition of standard lecture and reference material; is very accurate; has an element ofnovelty if not originality; provides evidence of reading beyond the required reading; displaysan awareness of other approaches to the problem area; has an appreciation of methodologicalconcerns and displays an awareness of the limitations of current knowledge; displaysexcellent use of relevant data and examples, all properly referenced.Second Upper (60-69): Work of superior quality on major objectives of the subjectThis is a highly competent level of performance. The work directly addresses the question orproblems raised; provides a coherent argument drawing on relevant information; shows someabilities to evaluate concepts and theory and to relate theory to practice; reflects the student’sown argument and is not just a repetition of standard lecture and reference material; does notsuffer from any major errors or omissions; provides evidence of reading beyond the requiredreading; displays an awareness of other approaches to the problem area; displays good use ofrelevant data and examples, all properly referenced.Second Lower (50-59): Work of good quality on major objectives of the subjectThis is an acceptable level of performance. The work addresses the question but providesonly a basic outline of relevant arguments and evidence along the lines offered in the lecturesand referenced readings; answers are clear but limited; some minor omissions andinaccuracies but no major errors.